![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| BABBLEMUR! Seeking Common Sense in a World Gone Mad Got Comments? Email babblemur here! |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Book Review 6 June 2005 Philosopher breaks down management self- help books by Puripnon Applied Rhizomatics, as it is a business, will require a great amount of economic, managerial, etc. knowledge to run properly. With that in mind, I stumbled across this list while skimming the self- improvement regions of the blogsphere. It seemed like a pretty good selection of texts on just about every subject covered in an MBA program. I decided to look for these books at the library last night and found that most of them were checked out (good sign). A couple of the "Productivity" books were in, so I decided to speed read them to see if they were worthy of a perusal. They weren't. The first book I tried to read was The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. Half way through the book, I picked up Mr. Covey's formula:
The core of the book, that we should center our lives around principles rather than image and organize our lives from the inside out according to these principles, is decent, if not downright important. However, this only took me one run-on sentence to say, rather than 300+ pages. The rest of the book is fluff and Mr. Covey's often sly attempts (and sometimes outright attempts) to convert his readers to Christianity. If anyone is thinking about reading this book, don't. If you're interested in guidance and wisdom, turn to the book that contains all of Mr. Covey's important points and a whole lot more, The Meditations by Marcus Aurelius. Of course, Aurelius didn't write at a 5th grade reading level. The second piece of crap I read was The 80/20 Principle. It follows the EXACT SAME FORMULA AS ALL OF THESE OTHER SHITTY SELF-HELP BOOKS. This is just infinitely more annoying. The premise of this book is that 20% of something leads to 80% of something else. Yep, that's it. At first, this seems plausible. Common sense tells us that only a fraction of what we do is really important and that by focusing on this fraction, we can be more productive. Unfortunately, the author doesn't stop there. He tries to tie EVERYTHING IN THE GOD DAMNED WORLD into the 80/20 principle, as if it's a magical formula that explains everything, from crime, to our personal lives, to the unequal distribution of wealth. It insists that everything obeys this principle, and sites only evidence that proves this. This books fails to provide anything more than the aforementioned common sense in the way of advice. I have developed the 99/1 Principle. This principle is the following: 1% of a self-help book contains 99% of the book's value. Most of these books can be condensed into 2 pages of bullets, AT MOST. The other 99% is bullshit. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6 June 2005 Universal Health Care Rising by babblemur The concept of Universal Health Care is getting a lot of talk and attention lately given the economic health care crisis that no one seems to want to acknowledge. I could babble about this, but I would rather leave that to others with more finely tuned arguments. Below are article summaries, follow the headline link to go to the full text. Note that California and Vermont are both considering state level versions of a Universal Health Care system. Why the nation will embrace Universal Health Care by Lance Dickie, Seattle Times If the engine of change in most democracies is a disgruntled middle class, then I am emboldened to make a prediction. The U.S. is headed toward a single-payer system of universal health care. Everyone keeps his or her doctor and, more to the point, everyone will have one. The medical-delivery system — physicians, hospitals and pharmaceuticals — stays private, but the paperwork and bills are routed through and paid by the federal government. A Republican Argument for Universal Health Care: Part 1 by Ben Brothers (BadgerBlues) Democrats often take it as an article of faith that universal health care would be a good thing. We see it as an issue of moral justice. Freedom from want and freedom from fear are fundamental Democratic values, and making sure that every American has the right to adequate medical care has been a Democratic goal ever since Franklin Roosevelt proposed a Second Bill of Rights in 1944. We don't need to be convinced, but we're only half of the country. The other half of the country are Republicans, and many of them do need to be convinced. A Republican Argument for Universal Health Care: Part 2 by Ben Brothers (BadgerBlues) Yesterday I wrote about good American companies that provide good benefits for their workers and are penalized under the United States' uniquely self-defeating business model. The converse is that bad companies that do not play by the rules should not be rewarded for doing so. Wal- Mart employees are the largest group of Wisconsinites enrolled in BadgerCare. Wisconsin's taxpayers, including those who own businesses that compete with Wal-Mart, are subsidizing their competitor because Wal-Mart is not doing the right thing. Troubled Corporations Need Single Payer by Dave Zweifel, Capital Times (Madison) Anita Weier of our staff reported several weeks ago that a significant number of Wal-Mart employees in Wisconsin wind up having to rely on the state-paid BadgerCare program for their health insurance at a significant cost to the state's taxpayers. The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel last week repeated that information and added that while Wal-Mart by far leads the list of big corporations whose workers need to take advantage of taxpayer-paid poverty programs, there are several other big firms whose workers need to do so too. Also, see: There is a Solution to the Health Care Disaster By John Kolstad/President, Mill City Music California Senate advances universal health care plan (AP) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Family Carcass reprinted with permission by Steven Stwalley |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 June 2005 Wisconsin Legislature retaliates against the University of Wisconsin for being too damn liberal by babblemur The Joint Finance Committee of the Republican held Wisconsin State Legislature has voted 12-4 on party lines to slash the UW budget even beyond Democrat Gov. Doyle's cuts. There is great coverage of this at Lake Winneblogo and other places, so allow me to just state my opinion. Conservative legislators are lashing out at the University of Wisconsin for a number of reasons, none of which are related to the budget crisis. Among these are:
In other words, the University of Wisconsin has found itself opposite the Republican activists in the state legislature and in the middle of the culture war that is being fought in Wisconsin, whether the University knows it or not. To the Far Right, Academia is a 'left wing brain washing machine', and the faculty are all communists, socialists, and worst of all - liberals. So how can the Right Wing take on this Billion Dollar Behemoth? Starve it out. How can they reduce the influence of the Heathen Faculty? Shift the teaching burden on to 'non-tenure track' academic staff and freeze faculty hiring. And how can the state legislature help to 'protect' the youth of Wisconsin from being 'brain washed' by this education system? Raise tuitions and slash student aid so that only a select number of students can even attend the University for 'brain-warshin'. Its just a theory of mine, kind of like Evolution. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||