|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| July 4th Weekend issue: (By Akaoni) NICE BOMBS Join our Fearless Great Dear Leader Operation Yellow Elephant Torture Ships Spain Joins the Club Reason and Decency in the Great White North |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 July 2005 How do you say "Gay Marriage" in Spanish? Ask Zapatero... (From ZNet) [When the Spanish parliament yesterday took its historic vote legalizing both gay marriage and adoption of children by gay couples, Socialist Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero -- who put the full prestige of his office and party behind passage of the gay human rights legislation -- made one of the most remarkable speeches in favor of full equality for those with same-sex hearts ever delivered by a head of government anywhere. Here are excerpts from Zapatero's speech -- Doug Ireland] "We are not legislating, honorable members, for people far away and not known by us. We are enlarging the opportunity for happiness to our neighbors, our co-workers, our friends and, our families: at the same time we are making a more decent society, because a decent society is one that does not humiliate its members. "In the poem 'The Family,' our poet Luis Cernuda was sorry because, 'How does man live in denial in vain/by giving rules that prohibit and condemn?' Today, the Spanish society answers to a group of people who, during many years have, been humiliated, whose rights have been ignored, whose dignity has been offended, their identity denied, and their liberty oppressed. Today the Spanish society grants them the respect they deserve, recognizes their rights, restores their dignity, affirms their identity, and restores their liberty. "It is true that they are only a minority, but their triumph is everyone's triumph. It is also the triumph of those who oppose this law, even though they do not know this yet: because it is the triumph of Liberty. Their victory makes all of us (even those who oppose the law) better people, it makes our society better. Honorable members, There is no damage to marriage or to the concept of family in allowing two people of the same sex to get married. To the contrary, what happens is this class of Spanish citizens get the potential to organize their lives with the rights and privileges of marriage and family. There is no danger to the institution of marriage, but precisely the opposite: this law enhances and respects marriage. "Today, conscious that some people and institutions are in a profound disagreement with this change in our civil law, I wish to express that, like other reforms to the marriage code that preceded this one, this law will generate no evil, that its only consequence will be the avoiding of senseless suffering of decent human beings. A society that avoids senseless suffering of decent human beings is a better society. "With the approval of this Bill, our country takes another step in the path of liberty and tolerance that was begun by the democratic change of government. Our children will look at us incredulously if we tell them that many years ago, our mothers had less rights than our fathers, or if we tell them that people had to stay married against their will even though they were unable to share their lives. Today we can offer them a beautiful lesson: every right gained, each access to liberty has been the result of the struggle and sacrifice of many people that deserve our recognition and praise. "Today we demonstrate with this Bill that societies can better themselves and can cross barriers and create tolerance by putting a stop to the unhappiness and humiliation of some of our citizens. Today, for many of our countrymen, comes the day predicted by Kavafis one century ago: 'Later 'twas said of the most perfect society/someone else, made like me/certainly will come out and act freely.'" [Thanks to valiant gay journalist Rex Wockner for providing this translation.] |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 July 2005 Family Owned Oshkosh Bookstore Closing its Doors by babblemur LP Books, Formerly Little Professor Books, is closing its doors after 10 years of service to the Oshkosh, WI area. The independent book store will sell its last book on July 27th. Peg and Larry Koeppen have run the bookstore since 1995. They have been at their current location, 2060 S. Koeller since 1999. The Koeppens intend to retire and spend more time with family. The store has been on the market, but there has been no buyer. Their lease has expired so the doors are closing. In a letter from Peg Koeppen: "We appreciate the support of our customers through the years and wish you the best in your future." Please consider stopping in and thanking Peg and Larry, and help them liquidate their inventory. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dear Abby : Atheists, Christians and Jews, Oh My! DEAR ABBY: You were wrong, wrong, wrong to tell an atheist to say "amen" at the end of grace at dinner. Atheists do not believe that a god or gods of any kind exist. "Amen," according to my dictionary, is used to express solemn ratification. Atheists do not ratify religion. Being coerced to appear to do so in the name of etiquette can leave an atheist feeling used and dishonest. I, like many atheists, consider religion to be superstition, which, for the most part, is harmful to people. At its worst, religion prompts people to blow up buildings with innocent people -- even children -- in them. Examples include the "Christian" Identity gangsters who blew up the Federal Building in Oklahoma and the Muslims who flew airplanes into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. -- HAPPY HEATHEN IN TEXAS DEAR H.H.: We live in a country that guarantees religious freedom -- and that includes freedom FROM religion, if people wish. I disagree with you that religion is harmful, however. Religion doesn't prompt people to perpetrate the evils you described; FANATICISM does, when believers are inflamed by leaders with a political agenda. DEAR ABBY: Of course atheists should respect others' beliefs -- and their rituals. But believers should also respect atheists' right to reject those beliefs and their rituals. Respect goes both ways. Mutual respect is shown when atheists act as silent observers while believers go about their business, and believers resist shaming atheists for refusing to mimic them. -- NORMAN IN UPPER MONTCLAIR, N.J. DEAR NORMAN: Shaming others who refuse to mimic them? That's not proselytizing -- that's bullying. DEAR ABBY: You must not have consulted your religious experts when you advised the atheist to bow his head and say "amen" after his dinner companions finish saying grace. You advised the person to be a hypocrite. -- KIMBERLY IN KEARNEY, MO. DEAR KIMBERLY: If my mail is any indication, it can also mean "I'm glad it's over." I am Jewish, and I was describing what I do when grace is invoked. By the way, did you know that Jewish people do not say grace before a meal? We say a blessing thanking God for bread. A full grace is not said until after the meal, to be sure we have had a meal to eat, and know exactly what we are thanking God for. DEAR ABBY: What advice have you when the situation is reversed? Several times we have invited guests to our home for dinner, and when it became apparent that we do not observe this ritual, they have said some variation of "Shall we offer thanks?" It's usually a rhetorical question. We are torn between wanting to be gracious hosts and being offended that people of faith are attempting to bully us with their religion. One couple not only wanted to say grace in our home, they demanded that everyone stand while they intoned a prayer of thanks to whomever it is they worship. Is there a tactful way to let guests know the hosts do not appreciate the imposition of their religion? -- NON-BELIEVERS IN ILLINOIS DEAR NON-BELIEVERS: Certainly. Just say to your guest, "Thank you for offering, but that won't be necessary." |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Babblemur! proclaims that the "Dear Abby" column written by Jeanne Phillips (inherited from her mother, Pauline Phillips) is just fine. Her responses to letters exhibit common sense above and beyond what we see in the headlines and on the television set. See this column (second letter down) for a defense of a young teen struggling with homosexuality. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 July 2005 Greens Knock Dems for Not Knocking Bush hard enough on War, Lies, and the Downing St. Memo by babblemur The Green Party issued a Press Release criticising the Democrats for failing to hold Bush responsible for lying to the American People about justification for war with Iraq.
speech (of June 28) wasn't grounds for cautious criticism -- it was grounds for impeachment," said Elena Everett, chair of the North Carolina Green Party and Co-chair of the Green Party's Peace Action Committee. "None of the Democratic leaders who criticized Mr. Bush are willing to admit that the enormity of his deception deserves impeachment. None of them are willing to demand a halt to the slaughter of Iraqi civilians and U.S. troops by ending the occupation." From the Green Party: Greens have called the President's actions and statements grounds for impeachment, and have demanded an immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq. "The invasion made the world less, not more secure from terrorism," said Rebecca Rotzler, Co-chair of the Peace Action Committee and Deputy Mayor, Village of New Paltz, NY. "The only connection between the war on Iraq and the war on terror is that, by invading Iraq -- where al- Qaeda had zero or negligible presence before the invasion -- President Bush opened up Iraq to al-Qaeda, which is exploiting the chaos there and using Iraq as a training camp." In an effort to give credit where credit is due, I believe the Democratic Party of Wisconsin passed a resolution this summer in Oshkosh calling for the impeachment of Bush, following the Green Party's lead on this in 2003. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||