|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 11 July 2005 Oshkosh City Council breaks law, no one seems to care A second legal opinion has come out determining that the "no-bid" contract to build rest-rooms at the new Oshkosh Amphitheater was in violation of state law. In the second opinion it was determined that a local council can override the bidding laws with a 75% vote, which the Oshkosh City Council did not do, voting 5-2 to give the $675,000 contract to C J Meyer, Inc. The state law is meant to protect tax payers from cronyism and to ensure the lowest price for tax payer funded work. The DA's office has indicated that they have no intention of prosecuting the case, essentially stating "so what?" See article in Oshkosh Northwestern |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 11 July 2005 University of Wisconsin Tuition going up 6.9% The State Board of Regents has passed a massive 6.9% tuition hike across the UW system. Combined with President Bush's recent cuts to work study programs, this will force more poor and lower class students out of higher education, leaving military service in Iraq or prostitution as their best alternatives. Although the state legislature and other baby boomers are rapidly growing older, continuous financial cuts to the UW system combined with increases in tuition should ensure that only rich white kids will become the nursing assistants needed to take care of their physical needs in old age. See article in Oshkosh Northwestern |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| July 7, 2005 Issue Please Stop Killing Other People Gaylord Nelson, Earth Day Founder, Wisconsin Governor and Senator (1916-2005) "Who am I? Why am I here?" James Stockdale dies at 81 2005 Candidate John Daggett cleared of all charges |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 11 July 2005 Libertarian Party of Dane County: Eminent Domain Ruling a Raid on Property Rights Fascism is the partnership of the government and big business. The recent Supreme Court ruling upholding the power of any government to take, even by force, legally owned property to use, or give away, as they see fit should be of grave concern to all Americans. But even though this was a federal ruling, the ramification, as well as the ultimate use of such power, will be felt most at the local level. Backed with such a powerful ruling, however unconstitutional, we believe will further empower local governments to collude with corporate money under the guise of "community good". The foundation of freedom in America is grounded in the ownership of property. That many of our other rights to freedom are rooted in the right to own property. That without that basic freedom, it becomes a myth that anyone actually owns property. For if any government can simply determine that your property would be more useful to others than to you, it really is not yours, no matter if you hold the deed. And with it the foundation of your freedom. With so little real freedom left, this was a crushing blow to those of use who hold the founder*s vision of personal freedom precious. We have already seen what local governments have done, using the eminent domain power they already have. Witness the pig trough rush to secure others property when millions of dollars were thrown at local politicians to build an entertainment center. Property owners were forced to accept assessment prices rather than what the property was now worth due to the demand of the Overture largess. The Libertarian Party of Dane County calls on all freedom loving residents of Dane County to call on local representatives and let them know we will not stand for any more attempts to subvert our founder's wish that private property remain in the sole domain of the owner. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 11 July 2005 Maine Greens see rise in state wide voter registration Maine Greens now have 2.4% of the state's voter registration, compared to 28% for the Republicans and 31% for Democrats. The number is significant as one of the highest shares of registered voters by a third party in the nation. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 11 July 2005 Supreme Theft Supreme Court Ruling Legalizes 'Theft by Takings'. While Democratic and Republican officials side with developers, Greens vow to remain a bulwark against the condemnation of private homes. WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Green Party leaders sharply criticized the Supreme Court's June 23 decision in the Kelo v. City of New London case, calling it a "legalization of theft." The decision expands the power of government to condemn private property ('eminent domain'), permitting officials to transfer property from one private owner to another. "Working class and low income homeowners will be at special risk, since they provide less tax revenue, and the Court now gives permission for city councils and statehouses to evict and replace them with commercial and residential development for the sake of a wealthier tax base," said Steve Kramer, co-chair of the Green Party of the United States. "The Court has legalized theft -- theft from the poor for the rich." Green leaders say that the party will remain steadfast in its opposition to the use of eminent domain to remove people from their homes under the license provided by the Kelo v. City of New London decision. "Republican and Democratic officials -- including many liberal and progressive Democrats -- accept huge gifts from real estate interests that want to clear out neighborhoods for new development. Greens refuse all corporate contributions," said Peggy Lewis, who is also co-chair of the national Green Party. "In the wake of the New London decision, the choice between voting for a Green and voting for a Democrat or Republican in some races might spell the difference between keeping and losing one's home." Greens around the U.S. are fighting predatory development plans in which residents and small businesses face mass removal under strengthened powers of eminent domain:
"The decision proves that liberals may be as likely as conservatives to side with wealthy and corporate interests, and sometimes even more likely," said Greg Gerritt, secretary of the Green Party of the United States. "We now have reason to fear judicial appointments made by Democrats as much as the hard-right appointments of President Bush. We clearly need a new spectrum to describe politics -- dedication to corporate power versus dedication to the rights of people and the health of the environment. Let there be no doubt where Greens stand." Greens especially praised Justice O'Connor's dissenting opinion: "Any property may now be taken for the benefit of another private property, but the fallout from this decision will not be random. The beneficiaries are likely to be those citizens with disproportionate influence and power in the political process, including large corporations and development firms. As for the victims, the government now has license to transfer property from those with fewer resources to those with more. The Founders cannot have intended this perverse result." |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||